Complaint: In-flight Issue Dangerous
View Single Post
  #33  
Old Aug 18, 2014, 1:20 PM
Extremerecluse Extremerecluse is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cliff7080 View Post
If this plane went into a negative 2g dive, with people still standing up serving dinner, then there would have been a LOT of VERY seriously injured people with People, food carts and food spread ALL over the ceiling..

Just how did you KNOW it was a negative 2g dive and a lateral 2.5g recovery? Do you really carry instruments to measure that? AND looking at the Delta Detroit/Tokyo schedule they only fly that route with a 777 and they haven't used a 747 on that route for a long time.

So how about you answer my original question? Just WHEN did this happen?
These 2 g dives lasted .3 seconds each. You need to stop nit picking and start telling the truth about what really goes on in the cockpit. Safety is a culture. I would like to have been a fly on the wall observing the flight crew. Most crews are safe. Some are more than willing to take risks if it improves the bottom line. Jet A fuel is very expensive and it accounts for most of the expenses in a flight. The passengers do not have access to 4-Point seat harnesses. Don't fly as though they do!!!#