FAQ | Tips | About Us | Mark Forums Read |
|
Flights Canceled / Delayed / Overbooked Were you on a flight that was delayed, canceled, or overbooked? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
charleston service cancelled, terrible customer service
please see their discontinuance email notice below.
i booked a flight for christmas in late august and received this email on october 13. 1) prices for flights for this period have gone up. airtran did not provide any compensation for the inconvenience or increase in travel cost it forced upon me. 2) airtran had the gall to tell me that i would not incur any cancellation fees. please, need you insult my intelligence on top of canceling my flight with barely an apology? YOU cancelled MY flight. 3) airtran mistakenly told me that my flight could be rerouted to a nearby airport without a) change fees b) fare difference fees. when the agent learned this was not their policy, she made no effort to obtain it for me. i will never fly airtan again Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think you mis-read the email: (emphases on your OP mine)
Quote:
Quote:
AirTran made an operational decision to no longer serve Charleston. It's inconvenient, to say the least, but it happens sometimes. What you may want to do (if you haven't already requested a refund on this ticket) is find out which airlines fly the same route (you never mentioned what your starting point is) and call around. Sometimes when an airline completely discontinues service to a particular city other airlines will accept the ticket at face value for travel on the same dates. If you find an airline willing to do so they, or you, can call AirTran to have the ticket endorsed over to the new airline. There's no guarantee but it's worth a shot. When you call the other airlines mention that you are a frequent flier on AirTran (even if you are not, since they have no way of verifying this) however this cancellation has disappointed you and you are now looking to take your business elsewhere. I know Northwest has or had a program called BUMP (Bring Us More Passengers) where they were trying to poach passenegers from other airlines by accepting same day tickets from any other airline if they could get you to the same destination. Although Northwest is being merged into Delta their reservations and operations are still separate. Try their reservations call center first. The number is 1-800-225-2525. Explain your situation and mention that you heard something about the BUMP program. Maybe they can help you out. Good luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If a passenger purchases an airline ticket and wishes to change or cancel it, he loses typically $100 or $150. So if the airline cancels a flight for their own reasons, no act of God, I think it is only fair if they refund the passenger his money plus whatever charge they would have made for a date change.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Airtran already stated in their e-mail that the OP would receive a full refund with no fees or penalties. S/he also has the option to change the ticket with no fee however if the new fare is higher the difference will be charged.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
PHXFlyer, thank you for your suggestion. i wish the airline could have been so useful.
regarding the difference in policy between what was in the email and what was initially quoted to me, i understand it was a mistake - in my text you quoted, i included the word "mistakenly" intentionally. to bob, phxflyer: yes, i can rebook travel with no fees or penalties. imagine that! they cancel my flight and they magnanimously promise not to penalize me. i suppose i should be grateful? yes, they informed me in advance they could change the flight. i can also change the flight - at a cost of $50 and up. two parties are bound to an agreement and one reserves full leniency for itself to later alter its obligation, while the other will be penalized for changing its end. please, do not point out again that they are not penalizing me - they cannot penalize me since i did not cancel this, they did. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
PHP Code:
True the airline has given you notice but the price of the flight has gone up. I would suggest that if you can't get another airline operating between those points to allow you to fly for the same price as your ticket, book for the best price you can get. Then go to the airline and claim for the cost of your new ticket instead of a refund. When one party to a contract is in breach, he must restore the innocent party to the same position as if there was no breach. You don't need an bill of rights to establish this. That is already the law under the common law and the United States follows the common law principles of contract Last edited by AirlinesMustPay; Oct 18, 2009 at 5:00 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
well actually airlinesmustpay your wrong in this situation, the airlines ratified the wrong by giving the customer (with advanced notice) options, in this case a refund, so no breach was made and common law wouldn't come into place since there was notice and a reasonable resolution
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Are two parties bound to an agreement? Yes. Did airtrain keep their end. No. what have they done to rectify the situation? Gave you viable options that put you back on track. If they did nothing and you found out the night before you were supposed to fly, yea i'd be upset, but right now you can make arrangements. Airline, you have a good point, however if it's part of their contract of carriage, I don't think they will do much, probably vouchers for future travel. Plus your probably comparing apples and oranges when it comes to Airlines. If the OP is flying on a low-cost carrier, of course the price of the ticket may be more if he flies say Continental. My original suggestion still stands: take the refund, buy new tickets, enjoy the holidays and be thankful things didn't go a lot worse. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
To the OP:
You may want to consider the fact that you chose a low-cost carrier that may be barely surviving and without much of a reputation to maintain. If you were dealing with one of the major airlines, you would stand a better chance of getting back the price of the new ticket. Perhaps when you make the claim all you may really end up getting is the refund. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I hardly think Airtran is "barely surviving and without much of a reputation to maintain."
If that were the case, I don't believe they would be opening 4 new destinations in the next few months, they wouldn't have opened the 3-4 new stations they opened in the last few months. The fact is for any airline, if it is not profitable, they are not going to continue to fly there. All airlines LCC or major have the same "flights are subject to change without notice" policy. If you go to the store and buy something, then take it back because it doesn't work, and that was the last one they had because they have discontinued that item, they are not going to give you back more than what you paid just because they no longer carry it and it will cost more to buy it somewhere else. They are going to refund your purchase price. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
if you are going to propose an analogy, please make sure the situations are analogous first
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
This site is littered with terriblel analogies... I think you might be flogging a dead horse there jmb..
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jim, that's like saying Milli Vanilli could sing. Is that the worst analogy yet or not??
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Milli Vanilli couldn't sing? ~Say it ain't so!!
Next you will be telling me that Fox News is not "fair and balanced".... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
JMB let me try to say why Mr Bah Humbug's analogy is faulty. An analogy must be similar in as many respects as possible to the original situation and only then will it be justified to say that what follows from one will apply to the the other. If you buy the item in the store and walk away with it, the store having delivered the tem to you, does not have a pending contract to fulful. Immediately this is different from your situation, where the airline collected you money and has not yet deliveed the service. Their delivery of the service is pending. This is a major distinction. Can a party with a pending contract to fulfil discontinue the service for their own reasons? A second distinction is that in Mr Humbug's example it is the customer who returns to the merchant to say he no longer wants the item. In your case it is the airline who comes to the customer and says that this service that you paid for will not be delivered. A third major distinction is the availability of the item or service purchased. If you buy an item in Sears, and for some reason it has to be returned, when Sears returns your money, you go to JCPenney or Target or elsewhere (and most cities have dozens of places where these types of goods are available). For an airline ticket, unless it is a route passing through a major hub, you likely will find only one other airline operating the route. When an airline discontinue a route that passengers have paid for, the airline must know that the passengers are now put to the hassle of finding another airline. Here the only thing in favour of the airline, is that they have given you notice. A fourth distinction and this is relevant to the question of the adequacy of notice, is that price of airline tickets is something dynamic. We all know that usually it goes up and in your case it has. Mr Humbug's example of a customer purchase in a store is different. Consumer purchases in stores usually do not go up that quickly. So even though you get notice and you go to another airline, you find that the price has gone up. So a return of your money is not adequate. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
JMB let me try to say why Mr Bah Humbug's analogy is faulty. An analogy must be similar in as many respects as possible to the original situation and only then will it be justified to say that what follows from one will apply to the the other. If you buy the item in the store and walk away with it, the store having delivered the tem to you, does not have a pending contract to fulful. Immediately this is different from your situation, where the airline collected you money and has not yet deliveed the service. Their delivery of the service is pending. This is a major distinction. Can a party with a pending contract to fulfil discontinue the service for their own reasons? A second distinction is that in Mr Humbug's example it is the customer who returns to the merchant to say he no longer wants the item. In your case it is the airline who comes to the customer and says that this service that you paid for will not be delivered. A third major distinction is the availability of the item or service purchased. If you buy an item in Sears, and for some reason it has to be returned, when Sears returns your money, you go to JCPenney or Target or elsewhere (and most cities have dozens of places where these types of goods are available). For an airline ticket, unless it is a route passing through a major hub, you likely will find only one other airline operating the route. When an airline discontinue a route that passengers have paid for, the airline must know that the passengers are now put to the hassle of finding another airline. Here the only thing in favour of the airline, is that they have given you notice. A fourth distinction and this is relevant to the question of the adequacy of notice, is that price of airline tickets is something dynamic. We all know that usually it goes up and in your case it has. Mr Humbug's example of a customer purchase in a store is different. Consumer purchases in stores usually do not go up that quickly. So even though you get notice and you go to another airline, you find that the price has gone up. So a return of your money is not adequate. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Complaint | Complaint Author | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Customer Service terrible customer service | johnafa | Customer Service | 6 | Oct 2, 2009 10:42 PM |
Customer Service TERRIBLE customer service/ not honoring travel vouchers | eeichleay | Delta Air Lines Complaints | 13 | Sep 21, 2009 1:42 PM |
Baggage Problems terrible baggage and handling service | madmcd05 | Southwest Airlines Complaints | 1 | Jan 24, 2009 7:12 AM |
Qantas - Terrible service | jamesduk | Other Airline Complaints | 1 | May 31, 2008 11:44 PM |
Customer Service Terrible Customer Service | cstaab | United Airlines Complaints | 0 | Jun 19, 2007 12:36 AM |